Skip to content

Owners and Others: Proper Citizens and Migrants without Properties

Peter Schneck


Pages 463 - 489

DOI https://doi.org/10.33675/AMST/2020/4/9


open-access

This publication is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives 4.0.

Creative Commons License


Property rights are central to the concept of citizenship in the liberal state, but in relation to the obvious reality of unequal distribution of resources and material injustice, they also present its most central contradiction. Property rights, as guaranteed by the liberal state, always entail both a right to exclude and to control (the right of dominion), which makes the individual the “sovereign,” and a right to alienate, transfer, and contract property (including certain rights connected to possession, distribution, and further contracts). Of course, these latter social or communal aspects (or potentials) of property rights are dependent on the prior right of dominion, without which full control of the communal dimension of property would be impossible. Yet without the social—contractual—dimension, the right to property would be quite useless in a capitalist system of production, and it is in this regard that property as a legal institution, and not just as a right, attains a crucial status for the critical understanding of the relation between the legal and the cultural formation of the figure of the migrant and the figure of the citizen.

The focus of this article is on the ambiguous nexus—both the inevitable conflict and the inexorable convergence—between central notions of property and citizenship in the United States, on the one hand, and the concept of the migrant, on the other hand. It argues that one of the most essential properties of the migrant in U.S. cultural and legal imagination has been (and still is) the migrant’s defining lack of “properties”; that is, the migrant is defined by being essentially dispossessed and therefore in need of the “property” of others. That makes the migrant a precarious but also threatening dialectical presence vis-à-vis the citizen in the cultural and legal imaginary of the United States. This article will discuss this dialectic in reference to the history of Asian American immigration and citizenship and, more particularly, in relation to the function of literature in the ongoing negotiation of the properties of the migrant.

Keywords: migration United States; immigration United States; property; naturalization; migration law; literary fiction.

1 Aoki, Keith. “No Right to Own?: The Early Twentieth-Century ‘Alien Land Laws’ as a Prelude to Internment.” Boston College Third World Law Review 19.1 (1998): 37-72. Print.

2 Bandhar, Brenna. Colonial Lives of Property: Land, Law and Racial Regimes of Ownership. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2018. Print.

3 Bloom, Harold. David Guterson’s Snow Falling on Cedars. Philadelphia, PA: Chelsea, 2004. Print.

4 Chuman, Frank F. The Bamboo People: The Law and Japanese Americans. Del Mar, CA: Publisher’s Inc., 1976. Print.

5 Douglas, J. Allen. “The ‘Priceless Possession’ of Citizenship: Race, Nation and Naturalization in American Law, 1880-1930.” Duquesne Law Review 43.3 (2004): 369-428. Print.

6 Grant, Nicole. “White Supremacy and Alien Land Laws of Washington State.” HSTAA 498 (2008): n. pag. Web. 10 May 2020. https://depts.washington.edu/civilr/alien_land_laws.htm.

7 Guterson, David. Snow Falling on Cedars. 1994. London: Bloomsbury, 2017. Print.

8 Ibrahim, Yasmin, and Anita Howarth. “Communicating the ‘Migrant’ Other as Risk: Space, EU and Expanding Borders.” Journal of Risk Research 21.12 (2018): 1465-86. Web. 21 Aug. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1313765.

9 Jacobson, David. Rights across Borders: Immigration and the Decline of Citizenship. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins UP, 1996. Print.

10 Lazarus III, Mark L. “An Historical Analysis of Alien Land Law: Washington Territory & State, 1853-1889.” U of Puget Law Review 12.2 (1989): 197-246. Print.

11 Lowe, Lisa. Immigrant Acts: On Asian American Cultural Politics. Durham, NC: Duke UP, 1996. Print.

12 Lund, Christian. “Property and Citizenship: Conceptually Connecting Land Rights and Belonging in Africa.” Africa Spectrum 46.3 (2011): 71-75. Print.

13 Malkki, Liisa. “National Geographic: The Rooting of Peoples and the Territorialization of National Identity among Scholars and Refugees.” Cultural Anthropology 7.1 (1992): 24-44. Print.

14 Mathews, Linda. “At Home With: David Guterson; Amid the Cedars, Serenity and Success.” New York Times 29 Feb. 1996: C1. Print.

15 >McGovney, Dudley O. “The Anti-Japanese Land Laws of California and Ten Other States.” California Law Review 35 (1947): 7-60. Print.

16 McKeown, Adam. Melancholy Order: Asian Migration and the Globalization of Borders. New York: Columbia UP, 2008. Print.

17 Molina, Natalia. How Race Is Made in America: Immigration, Citzenship, and the Historical Power of Racial Scripts. Berkeley: U of California P, 2014. Print.

18 Nail, Thomas. The Figure of the Migrant. Stanford, CA: Stanford UP, 2015. Print.

19 ---, et al. “A Roundtable on: Thomas Nail. The Figure of the Migrant. Prepared by Mark William Westmoreland.” PhænEx 11.1 (2016): 141-62. Print.

20 Ngai, Mae N. Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America. Princeton NJ: Princeton UP, 2004. Print.

21 Paul, Heike. “Old, New and ‘Neo’ Immigrant Fictions in American Literature: The Immigrant Presence in David Guterson’s Snow Falling on Cedars and T. C. Boyle’s The Tortilla Curtain.” Amerikastudien / American Studies 46.2 (2001): 249-65. Print.

22 Saito, Natsu Taylor. “Alien and Non-Alien Alike: Citizenship, ‘Foreigness,’ and Racial Hierarchy in American Law.” Oregon Law Review 76.261 (1997): 261-346. Print.

23 Shachar, Ayelet. The Birthright Lottery: Citizenship and Global Inequality. Boston, MA: Harvard UP, 2009. Print.

24 Shachar, Ayelet, and Ran Hirschl. “Citizenship as Inherited Property.” Political Theory 35.3 (2007): 253-87. Print.

25 V, Archana. “‘The Dirty Jap’: The Trial of Prejudice in David Guterson’s Snow Falling on Cedars.” IUP Journal of American Literature 5.1 (2011): 20-28. Print.

26 Vertovec, Steven. “The Cultural Politics of Nation and Migration.” Annual Review of Anthropology 40 (2011): 241-56. Print.

27 Villazor, Rose Cuison. “Rediscovering Oyama v. California: At the Intersection of Property, Race, and Citizenship.” Washington U Law Review 87.5 (2010): 979-1042. Print.

28 Weaver, John C. The Great Land Rush and the Making of the Modern World, 1650-1900. Montreal: McGill UP, 2003. Print.

Share


Export Citation